 | |
|
|
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| |
|
SUGGEST A LINKLink title
URL Do you wish to be notified when your link has been published? We do not know Name |
eh says: its not a bad thing to show our kids the consequences of drugs. drug users are getting younger and younger all the time. kids today arent as sensitive as they used to be. its the same as teaching kids about homosexuals anyways. everything scars kids. seeing a dead cat on the side of the road can change a kid. the world is never pure and you cant hide the ugliness and evil of the world. especially now. isnt a six year old too young to learn about homosexuals?
   March 27th, 2008 • Posted in
Comments 6
These nine drawings were done by an artist under the influence of LSD – part of test conducted by the US government during it’ s dalliance with psychotomimetic drugs in the late 1950s. The artist was given a dose of LSD 25 and free access to an activity box full of crayons and pencils. His subject is the medico that jabbed him. Simon says: The bottom line for me is this is another example of how what we see is based on our conditioned mind. In our neutral or normal state of chemical balance, we see things one way. By creating an imbalance (not using imbalance in a negative way here) we demonstrate that we are entirely at the mercy of this chemical state, and that our reality is equally so. There is no right or wrong here - the argumentative and all-knowing tones of the comments astounds me when this, of all topics, should encourage an accepting and harmonious discussion about the illusory nature of our sensory worlds.
I liked the pics at 4:25 and 5:45 best :)
December 24th, 2007 • Posted in
Comments 187
Anonymous says: ALWAYS or CAREFREE the BEST WAY! believe me ;)
December 21st, 2007 • Posted in
Comments 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
